Fault diagnostic systems and methods for model predictive control

ABSTRACT

A model predictive control (MPC) module: identifies sets of possible target values based on an engine torque request; determines predicted operating parameters for the sets of possible target values, respectively; determines cost values for the sets of possible target values, respectively; selects one of the sets of possible target values based on the cost values; and sets target values based on the possible target values of the selected one of the sets. An actuator module controls an engine actuator based on one of the target values. A fault diagnostic module selectively diagnoses a fault in the MPC module.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. ______ (HDP Ref. No. 8540P-001406) filed on [herewith], Ser. No. ______ (HDP Ref. No. 8540P-001409) filed on [herewith], Ser. No. ______ (HDP Ref. No. 8540P-001410) filed on [herewith], Ser. No. ______ (HDP Ref. No. 8540P-001411) filed on [herewith], Ser. No. ______ (HDP Ref. No. 8540P-001412) filed on [herewith], Ser. No. ______ (HDP Ref. No. 8540P-001413) filed on [herewith], Ser. No. ______ (HDP Ref. No. 8540P-001417) filed on [herewith], Ser. No. ______ (HDP Ref. No. 8540P-001418) filed on [herewith], Ser. No. ______ (HDP Ref. No. 8540P-001426) filed on [herewith], Ser. No. ______ (HDP Ref. No. 8540P-001427) filed on [herewith], Ser. No. ______ (HDP Ref. No. 8540P-001428) filed on [herewith], Ser. No. ______ (HDP Ref. No. 8540P-001429) filed on [herewith], Ser. No. ______ (HDP Ref. No. 8540P-001431) filed on [herewith], and ______ (HDP Ref. No. 8540P-001432) filed on [herewith]. The entire disclosures of the above applications are incorporated herein by reference.

FIELD

The present disclosure relates to internal combustion engines and more particularly to engine control systems and methods for vehicles.

BACKGROUND

The background description provided here is for the purpose of generally presenting the context of the disclosure. Work of the presently named inventors, to the extent it is described in this background section, as well as aspects of the description that may not otherwise qualify as prior art at the time of filing, are neither expressly nor impliedly admitted as prior art against the present disclosure.

Internal combustion engines combust an air and fuel mixture within cylinders to drive pistons, which produces drive torque. Air flow into the engine is regulated via a throttle. More specifically, the throttle adjusts throttle area, which increases or decreases air flow into the engine. As the throttle area increases, the air flow into the engine increases. A fuel control system adjusts the rate that fuel is injected to provide a desired air/fuel mixture to the cylinders and/or to achieve a desired torque output. Increasing the amount of air and fuel provided to the cylinders increases the torque output of the engine.

In spark-ignition engines, spark initiates combustion of an air/fuel mixture provided to the cylinders. In compression-ignition engines, compression in the cylinders combusts the air/fuel mixture provided to the cylinders. Spark timing and air flow may be the primary mechanisms for adjusting the torque output of spark-ignition engines, while fuel flow may be the primary mechanism for adjusting the torque output of compression-ignition engines.

Engine control systems have been developed to control engine output torque to achieve a desired torque. Traditional engine control systems, however, do not control the engine output torque as accurately as desired. Further, traditional engine control systems do not provide a rapid response to control signals or coordinate engine torque control among various devices that affect the engine output torque.

SUMMARY

In a feature, an engine control system is disclosed. A model predictive control (MPC) module: identifies sets of possible target values based on an engine torque request; determines predicted operating parameters for the sets of possible target values, respectively; determines cost values for the sets of possible target values, respectively; selects one of the sets of possible target values based on the cost values; and sets target values based on the possible target values of the selected one of the sets. An actuator module controls an engine actuator based on one of the target values. A fault diagnostic module selectively diagnoses a fault in the MPC module.

In future features, the MPC module selects one of the sets of possible target values further based on predetermined ranges for the target values, respectively.

In still further features, the fault diagnostic module diagnoses the fault when one of the target values is outside of its predetermined range.

In yet further features, the MPC module: identifies a first one of the sets of possible target values based on a first cost value of the first one of the sets; determines whether the possible target values of the first one of the possible sets are within the predetermined ranges, respectively; when one of the possible target values of the selected one of the sets is outside of its predetermined range, identifies a second one of the sets of possible target values based on a second cost value of the second one of the sets; and, when the possible target values of the second one of the sets are within the predetermined ranges, respectively, selects the second one of the sets.

In further features, the fault diagnostic module diagnoses the fault when the second cost value of the second one of the sets is less than the first cost value of the first one of the sets.

In still further features, the fault diagnostic module diagnoses the fault in the MPC module when the MPC module fails to select one of the sets of possible target values within a predetermined period.

In yet further features, the MPC module further determines an integrator value based on a difference between a first one of the predicted operating parameters and one of a measured and an estimated value of that operating parameter.

In further features, the fault diagnostic module diagnoses the fault in the MPC module when the integrator value is greater than a predetermined value.

In still further features: a reference module determines reference values based on the engine torque request; and, when the fault is diagnosed in the MPC module, the actuator module controls the engine actuator based on one of the reference values.

In still further features: a boost actuator module that controls opening of a wastegate of a turbocharger based on a second one of the target values; an exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) actuator module that controls opening of an EGR valve based on a third one of the target values; and a phaser actuator module that controls intake and exhaust valve phasing based on fourth and fifth ones of the target values, respectively, wherein the actuator module controls the opening of a throttle valve based on the one of the target values.

An engine control method for a vehicle includes, using a model predictive control (MPC) module: identifying sets of possible target values based on an engine torque request; determining predicted operating parameters for the sets of possible target values, respectively; determining cost values for the sets of possible target values, respectively; selecting one of the sets of possible target values based on the cost values; and setting target values based on the possible target values of the selected one of the sets. The engine control method further includes: controlling an engine actuator based on one of the target values; and selectively diagnosing a fault in the MPC module.

In further features, the engine control method further includes selecting one of the sets of possible target values further based on predetermined ranges for the target values, respectively.

In still further features, the engine control method further includes diagnosing the fault when one of the target values is outside of its predetermined range.

In yet further features, the engine control method further includes, using the MPC module: identifying a first one of the sets of possible target values based on a first cost value of the first one of the sets; determining whether the possible target values of the first one of the possible sets are within the predetermined ranges, respectively; when one of the possible target values of the selected one of the sets is outside of its predetermined range, identifying a second one of the sets of possible target values based on a second cost value of the second one of the sets; and, when the possible target values of the second one of the sets are within the predetermined ranges, respectively, selecting the second one of the sets.

In further features, the engine control method further includes diagnosing the fault when the second cost value of the second one of the sets is less than the first cost value of the first one of the sets.

In still further features, the engine control method further includes diagnosing the fault in the MPC module when the MPC module fails to select one of the sets of possible target values within a predetermined period.

In yet further features, the engine control method further includes determining an integrator value based on a difference between a first one of the predicted operating parameters and one of a measured and an estimated value of that operating parameter.

In further features, the engine control method further includes diagnosing the fault in the MPC module when the integrator value is greater than a predetermined value.

In still further features, the engine control method further includes: determining reference values based on the engine torque request; and, when the fault is diagnosed in the MPC module, controlling the engine actuator based on one of the reference values.

In yet further features, the engine control method further includes: controlling opening of a wastegate of a turbocharger based on a second one of the target values; controlling opening of an exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) valve based on a third one of the target values; and controlling intake and exhaust valve phasing based on fourth and fifth ones of the target values, respectively, wherein the engine actuator is a throttle valve.

Further areas of applicability of the present disclosure will become apparent from the detailed description, the claims and the drawings. The detailed description and specific examples are intended for purposes of illustration only and are not intended to limit the scope of the disclosure.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The present disclosure will become more fully understood from the detailed description and the accompanying drawings, wherein:

FIG. 1 is a functional block diagram of an example engine system according to the present disclosure;

FIG. 2 is a functional block diagram of an example engine control system according to the present disclosure;

FIG. 3 is a functional block diagram of an example air control module according to the present disclosure;

FIG. 4 is a flowchart depicting an example method of controlling a throttle valve, intake and exhaust valve phasing, a wastegate, and an exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) valve using model predictive control according to the present disclosure;

FIG. 5 is a flowchart depicting an example method of diagnosing faults in a model predictive control module according to the present disclosure; and

FIG. 6 is a flowchart depicting an example method of testing a model predictive control module according to the present disclosure.

In the drawings, reference numbers may be reused to identify similar and/or identical elements.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

An engine control module (ECM) controls torque output of an engine. More specifically, the ECM controls actuators of the engine based on target values, respectively, based on a requested amount of torque. For example, the ECM controls intake and exhaust camshaft phasing based on target intake and exhaust phaser angles, a throttle valve based on a target throttle opening, an exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) valve based on a target EGR opening, and a wastegate of a turbocharger based on a target wastegate duty cycle.

The ECM could determine the target values individually using multiple single input single output (SISO) controllers, such as proportional integral derivative (PID) controllers. However, when multiple SISO controllers are used, the target values may be set to maintain system stability at the expense of possible fuel consumption decreases. Additionally, calibration and design of the individual SISO controllers may be costly and time consuming.

The ECM of the present disclosure generates the target values using a model predictive control (MPC) module. The MPC module identifies possible sets of target values based on an engine torque request. The MPC module may determine predicted parameters for each of the possible sets based on the possible sets' target values and a mathematical model of the engine.

The MPC module may also determine a cost associated with use of each of the possible sets. The cost determined for a possible set increases as differences between the target values of the possible set and the reference value, respectively, increase and vice versa. In various implementations, instead of or in addition to identifying possible sets of target values and determining the cost of each of the sets, the MPC module may generate a surface representing the cost of possible sets of target values. The MPC module may then identify the possible set that has the lowest cost based on the slope of the cost surface. The ECM of the present disclosure diagnoses faults in the MPC module. One or more remedial actions may be taken when a fault is present in the MPC module.

Referring now to FIG. 1, a functional block diagram of an example engine system 100 is presented. The engine system 100 includes an engine 102 that combusts an air/fuel mixture to produce drive torque for a vehicle based on driver input from a driver input module 104. The engine 102 may be a gasoline spark ignition internal combustion engine.

Air is drawn into an intake manifold 110 through a throttle valve 112. For example only, the throttle valve 112 may include a butterfly valve having a rotatable blade. An engine control module (ECM) 114 controls a throttle actuator module 116, which regulates opening of the throttle valve 112 to control the amount of air drawn into the intake manifold 110.

Air from the intake manifold 110 is drawn into cylinders of the engine 102. While the engine 102 may include multiple cylinders, for illustration purposes a single representative cylinder 118 is shown. For example only, the engine 102 may include 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, and/or 12 cylinders. The ECM 114 may instruct a cylinder actuator module 120 to selectively deactivate some of the cylinders, which may improve fuel economy under certain engine operating conditions.

The engine 102 may operate using a four-stroke cycle. The four strokes, described below, may be referred to as the intake stroke, the compression stroke, the combustion stroke, and the exhaust stroke. During each revolution of a crankshaft (not shown), two of the four strokes occur within the cylinder 118. Therefore, two crankshaft revolutions are necessary for the cylinder 118 to experience all four of the strokes.

During the intake stroke, air from the intake manifold 110 is drawn into the cylinder 118 through an intake valve 122. The ECM 114 controls a fuel actuator module 124, which regulates fuel injection to achieve a target air/fuel ratio. Fuel may be injected into the intake manifold 110 at a central location or at multiple locations, such as near the intake valve 122 of each of the cylinders. In various implementations (not shown), fuel may be injected directly into the cylinders or into mixing chambers associated with the cylinders. The fuel actuator module 124 may halt injection of fuel to cylinders that are deactivated.

The injected fuel mixes with air and creates an air/fuel mixture in the cylinder 118. During the compression stroke, a piston (not shown) within the cylinder 118 compresses the air/fuel mixture. A spark actuator module 126 energizes a spark plug 128 in the cylinder 118 based on a signal from the ECM 114, which ignites the air/fuel mixture. The timing of the spark may be specified relative to the time when the piston is at its topmost position, referred to as top dead center (TDC).

The spark actuator module 126 may be controlled by a timing signal specifying how far before or after TDC to generate the spark. Because piston position is directly related to crankshaft rotation, operation of the spark actuator module 126 may be synchronized with crankshaft angle. Generating spark may be referred to as a firing event. The spark actuator module 126 may have the ability to vary the timing of the spark for each firing event. The spark actuator module 126 may vary the spark timing for a next firing event when the spark timing is changed between a last firing event and the next firing event. The spark actuator module 126 may halt provision of spark to deactivated cylinders.

During the combustion stroke, the combustion of the air/fuel mixture drives the piston away from TDC, thereby driving the crankshaft. The combustion stroke may be defined as the time between the piston reaching TDC and the time at which the piston reaches bottom dead center (BDC). During the exhaust stroke, the piston begins moving away from BDC and expels the byproducts of combustion through an exhaust valve 130. The byproducts of combustion are exhausted from the vehicle via an exhaust system 134.

The intake valve 122 may be controlled by an intake camshaft 140, while the exhaust valve 130 may be controlled by an exhaust camshaft 142. In various implementations, multiple intake camshafts (including the intake camshaft 140) may control multiple intake valves (including the intake valve 122) for the cylinder 118 and/or may control the intake valves (including the intake valve 122) of multiple banks of cylinders (including the cylinder 118). Similarly, multiple exhaust camshafts (including the exhaust camshaft 142) may control multiple exhaust valves for the cylinder 118 and/or may control exhaust valves (including the exhaust valve 130) for multiple banks of cylinders (including the cylinder 118). In various other implementations, the intake valve 122 and/or the exhaust valve 130 may be controlled by devices other than camshafts, such as camless valve actuators. The cylinder actuator module 120 may deactivate the cylinder 118 by disabling opening of the intake valve 122 and/or the exhaust valve 130.

The time when the intake valve 122 is opened may be varied with respect to piston TDC by an intake cam phaser 148. The time when the exhaust valve 130 is opened may be varied with respect to piston TDC by an exhaust cam phaser 150. A phaser actuator module 158 may control the intake cam phaser 148 and the exhaust cam phaser 150 based on signals from the ECM 114. When implemented, variable valve lift (not shown) may also be controlled by the phaser actuator module 158.

The engine system 100 may include a turbocharger that includes a hot turbine 160-1 that is powered by hot exhaust gases flowing through the exhaust system 134. The turbocharger also includes a cold air compressor 160-2 that is driven by the turbine 160-1. The compressor 160-2 compresses air leading into the throttle valve 112. In various implementations, a supercharger (not shown), driven by the crankshaft, may compress air from the throttle valve 112 and deliver the compressed air to the intake manifold 110.

A wastegate 162 may allow exhaust to bypass the turbine 160-1, thereby reducing the boost (the amount of intake air compression) provided by the turbocharger. A boost actuator module 164 may control the boost of the turbocharger by controlling opening of the wastegate 162. In various implementations, two or more turbochargers may be implemented and may be controlled by the boost actuator module 164.

An air cooler (not shown) may transfer heat from the compressed air charge to a cooling medium, such as engine coolant or air. An air cooler that cools the compressed air charge using engine coolant may be referred to as an intercooler. An air cooler that cools the compressed air charge using air may be referred to as a charge air cooler. The compressed air charge may receive heat, for example, via compression and/or from components of the exhaust system 134. Although shown separated for purposes of illustration, the turbine 160-1 and the compressor 160-2 may be attached to each other, placing intake air in close proximity to hot exhaust.

The engine system 100 may include an exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) valve 170, which selectively redirects exhaust gas back to the intake manifold 110. The EGR valve 170 may be located upstream of the turbocharger's turbine 160-1. The EGR valve 170 may be controlled by an EGR actuator module 172 based on signals from the ECM 114.

A position of the crankshaft may be measured using a crankshaft position sensor 180. A rotational speed of the crankshaft (an engine speed) may be determined based on the crankshaft position. A temperature of the engine coolant may be measured using an engine coolant temperature (ECT) sensor 182. The ECT sensor 182 may be located within the engine 102 or at other locations where the coolant is circulated, such as a radiator (not shown).

A pressure within the intake manifold 110 may be measured using a manifold absolute pressure (MAP) sensor 184. In various implementations, engine vacuum, which is the difference between ambient air pressure and the pressure within the intake manifold 110, may be measured. A mass flow rate of air flowing into the intake manifold 110 may be measured using a mass air flow (MAF) sensor 186. In various implementations, the MAF sensor 186 may be located in a housing that also includes the throttle valve 112.

The throttle actuator module 116 may monitor the position of the throttle valve 112 using one or more throttle position sensors (TPS) 190. An ambient temperature of air being drawn into the engine 102 may be measured using an intake air temperature (IAT) sensor 192. The engine system 100 may also include one or more other sensors 193, such as an ambient humidity sensor, one or more knock sensors, a compressor outlet pressure sensor and/or a throttle inlet pressure sensor, a wastegate position sensor, an EGR position sensor, and/or one or more other suitable sensors. The ECM 114 may use signals from the sensors to make control decisions for the engine system 100.

The ECM 114 may communicate with a transmission control module 194 to coordinate shifting gears in a transmission (not shown). For example, the ECM 114 may reduce engine torque during a gear shift. The ECM 114 may communicate with a hybrid control module 196 to coordinate operation of the engine 102 and an electric motor 198.

The electric motor 198 may also function as a generator, and may be used to produce electrical energy for use by vehicle electrical systems and/or for storage in a battery. In various implementations, various functions of the ECM 114, the transmission control module 194, and the hybrid control module 196 may be integrated into one or more modules.

Each system that varies an engine parameter may be referred to as an engine actuator. For example, the throttle actuator module 116 may adjust opening of the throttle valve 112 to achieve a target throttle opening area. The spark actuator module 126 controls the spark plugs to achieve a target spark timing relative to piston TDC. The fuel actuator module 124 controls the fuel injectors to achieve target fueling parameters. The phaser actuator module 158 may control the intake and exhaust cam phasers 148 and 150 to achieve target intake and exhaust cam phaser angles, respectively. The EGR actuator module 172 may control the EGR valve 170 to achieve a target EGR opening area. The boost actuator module 164 controls the wastegate 162 to achieve a target wastegate opening area. The cylinder actuator module 120 controls cylinder deactivation to achieve a target number of activated or deactivated cylinders.

The ECM 114 generates the target values for the engine actuators to cause the engine 102 to generate a target engine output torque. The ECM 114 generates the target values for the engine actuators using model predictive control, as discussed further below.

Referring now to FIG. 2, a functional block diagram of an example engine control system is presented. An example implementation of the ECM 114 includes a driver torque module 202, an axle torque arbitration module 204, and a propulsion torque arbitration module 206. The ECM 114 may include a hybrid optimization module 208. The ECM 114 also includes a reserves/loads module 220, a torque requesting module 224, an air control module 228, a spark control module 232, a cylinder control module 236, and a fuel control module 240.

The driver torque module 202 may determine a driver torque request 254 based on a driver input 255 from the driver input module 104. The driver input 255 may be based on, for example, a position of an accelerator pedal and a position of a brake pedal. The driver input 255 may also be based on cruise control, which may be an adaptive cruise control system that varies vehicle speed to maintain a predetermined following distance. The driver torque module 202 may store one or more mappings of accelerator pedal position to target torque and may determine the driver torque request 254 based on a selected one of the mappings.

An axle torque arbitration module 204 arbitrates between the driver torque request 254 and other axle torque requests 256. Axle torque (torque at the wheels) may be produced by various sources including an engine and/or an electric motor. For example, the axle torque requests 256 may include a torque reduction requested by a traction control system when positive wheel slip is detected. Positive wheel slip occurs when axle torque overcomes friction between the wheels and the road surface, and the wheels begin to slip against the road surface. The axle torque requests 256 may also include a torque increase request to counteract negative wheel slip, where a tire of the vehicle slips in the other direction with respect to the road surface because the axle torque is negative.

The axle torque requests 256 may also include brake management requests and vehicle over-speed torque requests. Brake management requests may reduce axle torque to ensure that the axle torque does not exceed the ability of the brakes to hold the vehicle when the vehicle is stopped. Vehicle over-speed torque requests may reduce the axle torque to prevent the vehicle from exceeding a predetermined speed. The axle torque requests 256 may also be generated by vehicle stability control systems.

The axle torque arbitration module 204 outputs a predicted torque request 257 and an immediate torque request 258 based on the results of arbitrating between the received torque requests 254 and 256. As described below, the predicted and immediate torque requests 257 and 258 from the axle torque arbitration module 204 may selectively be adjusted by other modules of the ECM 114 before being used to control the engine actuators.

In general terms, the immediate torque request 258 may be an amount of currently desired axle torque, while the predicted torque request 257 may be an amount of axle torque that may be needed on short notice. The ECM 114 controls the engine system 100 to produce an axle torque equal to the immediate torque request 258. However, different combinations of target values may result in the same axle torque. The ECM 114 may therefore adjust the target values to enable a faster transition to the predicted torque request 257, while still maintaining the axle torque at the immediate torque request 258.

In various implementations, the predicted torque request 257 may be set based on the driver torque request 254. The immediate torque request 258 may be set to less than the predicted torque request 257 under some circumstances, such as when the driver torque request 254 is causing wheel slip on an icy surface. In such a case, a traction control system (not shown) may request a reduction via the immediate torque request 258, and the ECM 114 reduces the engine torque output to the immediate torque request 258. However, the ECM 114 performs the reduction so the engine system 100 can quickly resume producing the predicted torque request 257 once the wheel slip stops.

In general terms, the difference between the immediate torque request 258 and the (generally higher) predicted torque request 257 can be referred to as a torque reserve. The torque reserve may represent the amount of additional torque (above the immediate torque request 258) that the engine system 100 can begin to produce with minimal delay. Fast engine actuators are used to increase or decrease current axle torque with minimal delay. Fast engine actuators are defined in contrast with slow engine actuators.

In general terms, fast engine actuators can change the axle torque more quickly than slow engine actuators. Slow actuators may respond more slowly to changes in their respective target values than fast actuators do. For example, a slow actuator may include mechanical components that require time to move from one position to another in response to a change in target value. A slow actuator may also be characterized by the amount of time it takes for the axle torque to begin to change once the slow actuator begins to implement the changed target value. Generally, this amount of time will be longer for slow actuators than for fast actuators. In addition, even after beginning to change, the axle torque may take longer to fully respond to a change in a slow actuator.

For example only, the spark actuator module 126 may be a fast actuator. Spark-ignition engines may combust fuels including, for example, gasoline and ethanol, by applying a spark. By way of contrast, the throttle actuator module 116 may be a slow actuator.

For example, as described above, the spark actuator module 126 can vary the spark timing for a next firing event when the spark timing is changed between a last firing event and the next firing event. By way of contrast, changes in throttle opening take longer to affect engine output torque. The throttle actuator module 116 changes the throttle opening by adjusting the angle of the blade of the throttle valve 112. Therefore, when the target value for opening of the throttle valve 112 is changed, there is a mechanical delay as the throttle valve 112 moves from its previous position to a new position in response to the change. In addition, air flow changes based on the throttle opening are subject to air transport delays in the intake manifold 110. Further, increased air flow in the intake manifold 110 is not realized as an increase in engine output torque until the cylinder 118 receives additional air in the next intake stroke, compresses the additional air, and commences the combustion stroke.

Using these actuators as an example, a torque reserve can be created by setting the throttle opening to a value that would allow the engine 102 to produce the predicted torque request 257. Meanwhile, the spark timing can be set based on the immediate torque request 258, which is less than the predicted torque request 257. Although the throttle opening generates enough air flow for the engine 102 to produce the predicted torque request 257, the spark timing is retarded (which reduces torque) based on the immediate torque request 258. The engine output torque will therefore be equal to the immediate torque request 258.

When additional torque is needed, the spark timing can be set based on the predicted torque request 257 or a torque between the predicted and immediate torque requests 257 and 258. By the following firing event, the spark actuator module 126 may return the spark timing to an optimum value, which allows the engine 102 to produce the full engine output torque achievable with the air flow already present. The engine output torque may therefore be quickly increased to the predicted torque request 257 without experiencing delays from changing the throttle opening.

The axle torque arbitration module 204 may output the predicted torque request 257 and the immediate torque request 258 to a propulsion torque arbitration module 206. In various implementations, the axle torque arbitration module 204 may output the predicted and immediate torque requests 257 and 258 to the hybrid optimization module 208.

The hybrid optimization module 208 may determine how much torque should be produced by the engine 102 and how much torque should be produced by the electric motor 198. The hybrid optimization module 208 then outputs modified predicted and immediate torque requests 259 and 260, respectively, to the propulsion torque arbitration module 206. In various implementations, the hybrid optimization module 208 may be implemented in the hybrid control module 196.

The predicted and immediate torque requests received by the propulsion torque arbitration module 206 are converted from an axle torque domain (torque at the wheels) into a propulsion torque domain (torque at the crankshaft). This conversion may occur before, after, as part of, or in place of the hybrid optimization module 208.

The propulsion torque arbitration module 206 arbitrates between propulsion torque requests 290, including the converted predicted and immediate torque requests. The propulsion torque arbitration module 206 generates an arbitrated predicted torque request 261 and an arbitrated immediate torque request 262. The arbitrated torque requests 261 and 262 may be generated by selecting a winning request from among received torque requests. Alternatively or additionally, the arbitrated torque requests may be generated by modifying one of the received requests based on another one or more of the received torque requests.

For example, the propulsion torque requests 290 may include torque reductions for engine over-speed protection, torque increases for stall prevention, and torque reductions requested by the transmission control module 194 to accommodate gear shifts. The propulsion torque requests 290 may also result from clutch fuel cutoff, which reduces the engine output torque when the driver depresses the clutch pedal in a manual transmission vehicle to prevent a flare in engine speed.

The propulsion torque requests 290 may also include an engine shutoff request, which may be initiated when a critical fault is detected. For example only, critical faults may include detection of vehicle theft, a stuck starter motor, electronic throttle control problems, and unexpected torque increases. In various implementations, when an engine shutoff request is present, arbitration selects the engine shutoff request as the winning request. When the engine shutoff request is present, the propulsion torque arbitration module 206 may output zero as the arbitrated predicted and immediate torque requests 261 and 262.

In various implementations, an engine shutoff request may simply shut down the engine 102 separately from the arbitration process. The propulsion torque arbitration module 206 may still receive the engine shutoff request so that, for example, appropriate data can be fed back to other torque requestors. For example, all other torque requestors may be informed that they have lost arbitration.

The reserves/loads module 220 receives the arbitrated predicted and immediate torque requests 261 and 262. The reserves/loads module 220 may adjust the arbitrated predicted and immediate torque requests 261 and 262 to create a torque reserve and/or to compensate for one or more loads. The reserves/loads module 220 then outputs adjusted predicted and immediate torque requests 263 and 264 to the torque requesting module 224.

For example only, a catalyst light-off process or a cold start emissions reduction process may require retarded spark timing. The reserves/loads module 220 may therefore increase the adjusted predicted torque request 263 above the adjusted immediate torque request 264 to create retarded spark for the cold start emissions reduction process. In another example, the air/fuel ratio of the engine and/or the mass air flow may be directly varied, such as by diagnostic intrusive equivalence ratio testing and/or new engine purging. Before beginning these processes, a torque reserve may be created or increased to quickly offset decreases in engine output torque that result from leaning the air/fuel mixture during these processes.

The reserves/loads module 220 may also create or increase a torque reserve in anticipation of a future load, such as power steering pump operation or engagement of an air conditioning (NC) compressor clutch. The reserve for engagement of the NC compressor clutch may be created when the driver first requests air conditioning. The reserves/loads module 220 may increase the adjusted predicted torque request 263 while leaving the adjusted immediate torque request 264 unchanged to produce the torque reserve. Then, when the NC compressor clutch engages, the reserves/loads module 220 may increase the adjusted immediate torque request 264 by the estimated load of the NC compressor clutch.

The torque requesting module 224 receives the adjusted predicted and immediate torque requests 263 and 264. The torque requesting module 224 determines how the adjusted predicted and immediate torque requests 263 and 264 will be achieved. The torque requesting module 224 may be engine type specific. For example, the torque requesting module 224 may be implemented differently or use different control schemes for spark-ignition engines versus compression-ignition engines.

In various implementations, the torque requesting module 224 may define a boundary between modules that are common across all engine types and modules that are engine type specific. For example, engine types may include spark-ignition and compression-ignition. Modules prior to the torque requesting module 224, such as the propulsion torque arbitration module 206, may be common across engine types, while the torque requesting module 224 and subsequent modules may be engine type specific.

The torque requesting module 224 determines an air torque request 265 based on the adjusted predicted and immediate torque requests 263 and 264. The air torque request 265 may be a brake torque. Brake torque may refer to torque at the crankshaft under the current operating conditions.

Target values for airflow controlling engine actuators are determined based on the air torque request 265. More specifically, based on the air torque request 265, the air control module 228 determines a target wastegate opening area 266, a target throttle opening area 267, a target EGR opening area 268, a target intake cam phaser angle 269, and a target exhaust cam phaser angle 270. The air control module 228 determines the target wastegate opening area 266, the target throttle opening area 267, the target EGR opening area 268, the target intake cam phaser angle 269, and the target exhaust cam phaser angle 270 using model predictive control, as discussed further below.

The boost actuator module 164 controls the wastegate 162 to achieve the target wastegate opening area 266. For example, a first conversion module 272 may convert the target wastegate opening area 266 into a target duty cycle 274 to be applied to the wastegate 162, and the boost actuator module 164 may apply a signal to the wastegate 162 based on the target duty cycle 274. In various implementations, the first conversion module 272 may convert the target wastegate opening area 266 into a target wastegate position (not shown), and convert the target wastegate position into the target duty cycle 274.

The throttle actuator module 116 controls the throttle valve 112 to achieve the target throttle opening area 267. For example, a second conversion module 276 may convert the target throttle opening area 267 into a target duty cycle 278 to be applied to the throttle valve 112, and the throttle actuator module 116 may apply a signal to the throttle valve 112 based on the target duty cycle 278. In various implementations, the second conversion module 276 may convert the target throttle opening area 267 into a target throttle position (not shown), and convert the target throttle position into the target duty cycle 278.

The EGR actuator module 172 controls the EGR valve 170 to achieve the target EGR opening area 268. For example, a third conversion module 280 may convert the target EGR opening area 268 into a target duty cycle 282 to be applied to the EGR valve 170, and the EGR actuator module 172 may apply a signal to the EGR valve 170 based on the target duty cycle 282. In various implementations, the third conversion module 280 may convert the target EGR opening area 268 into a target EGR position (not shown), and convert the target EGR position into the target duty cycle 282.

The phaser actuator module 158 controls the intake cam phaser 148 to achieve the target intake cam phaser angle 269. The phaser actuator module 158 also controls the exhaust cam phaser 150 to achieve the target exhaust cam phaser angle 270. In various implementations, a fourth conversion module (not shown) may be included and may convert the target intake and exhaust cam phaser angles into target intake and exhaust duty cycles, respectively. The phaser actuator module 158 may apply the target intake and exhaust duty cycles to the intake and exhaust cam phasers 148 and 150, respectively. In various implementations, the air control module 228 may determine a target overlap factor and a target effective displacement, and the phaser actuator module 158 may control the intake and exhaust cam phasers 148 and 150 to achieve the target overlap factor and the target effective displacement.

The torque requesting module 224 may also generate a spark torque request 283, a cylinder shut-off torque request 284, and a fuel torque request 285 based on the predicted and immediate torque requests 263 and 264. The spark control module 232 may determine how much to retard the spark timing (which reduces engine output torque) from an optimum spark timing based on the spark torque request 283. For example only, a torque relationship may be inverted to solve for a target spark timing 286. For a given torque request (T_(Req)), the target spark timing (S_(T)) 286 may be determined based on:

S _(T) =f ¹(T _(Req) ,APC,I,E,AF,OT,#),  (1)

where APC is an APC, I is an intake valve phasing value, E is an exhaust valve phasing value, AF is an air/fuel ratio, OT is an oil temperature, and # is a number of activated cylinders. This relationship may be embodied as an equation and/or as a lookup table. The air/fuel ratio (AF) may be the actual air/fuel ratio, as reported by the fuel control module 240.

When the spark timing is set to the optimum spark timing, the resulting torque may be as close to a minimum spark advance for best torque (MBT spark timing) as possible. Best torque refers to the maximum engine output torque that is generated for a given air flow as spark timing is advanced, while using fuel having an octane rating greater than a predetermined octane rating and using stoichiometric fueling. The spark timing at which this best occurs is referred to as an MBT spark timing. The optimum spark timing may differ slightly from MBT spark timing because of, for example, fuel quality (such as when lower octane fuel is used) and environmental factors, such as ambient humidity and temperature. The engine output torque at the optimum spark timing may therefore be less than MBT. For example only, a table of optimum spark timings corresponding to different engine operating conditions may be determined during a calibration phase of vehicle design, and the optimum value is determined from the table based on current engine operating conditions.

The cylinder shut-off torque request 284 may be used by the cylinder control module 236 to determine a target number of cylinders to deactivate 287. In various implementations, a target number of cylinders to activate may be used. The cylinder actuator module 120 selectively activates and deactivates the valves of cylinders based on the target number 287.

The cylinder control module 236 may also instruct the fuel control module 240 to stop providing fuel for deactivated cylinders and may instruct the spark control module 232 to stop providing spark for deactivated cylinders. The spark control module 232 may stop providing spark to a cylinder once an fuel/air mixture that is already present in the cylinder has been combusted.

The fuel control module 240 may vary the amount of fuel provided to each cylinder based on the fuel torque request 285. More specifically, the fuel control module 240 may generate target fueling parameters 288 based on the fuel torque request 285. The target fueling parameters 288 may include, for example, target mass of fuel, target injection starting timing, and target number of fuel injections.

During normal operation, the fuel control module 240 may operate in an air lead mode in which the fuel control module 240 attempts to maintain a stoichiometric air/fuel ratio by controlling fueling based on air flow. For example, the fuel control module 240 may determine a target fuel mass that will yield stoichiometric combustion when combined with a present mass of air per cylinder (APC).

FIG. 3 is a functional block diagram of an example implementation of the air control module 228. Referring now to FIGS. 2 and 3, as discussed above, the air torque request 265 may be a brake torque. A torque conversion module 304 converts the air torque request 265 from brake torque into base torque. The torque request resulting from conversion into base torque will be referred to as a base air torque request 308.

Base torques may refer to torque at the crankshaft made during operation of the engine 102 on a dynamometer while the engine 102 is warm and no torque loads are imposed on the engine 102 by accessories, such as an alternator and the NC compressor. The torque conversion module 304 may convert the air torque request 265 into the base air torque request 308, for example, using a mapping or a function that relates brake torques to base torques. In various implementations, the torque conversion module 304 may convert the air torque request 265 into another suitable type of torque, such as an indicated torque. An indicated torque may refer to a torque at the crankshaft attributable to work produced via combustion within the cylinders.

An MPC module 312 generates the target values 266-270 using MPC (Model Predictive Control). The MPC module 312 may be a single module or may comprise multiple modules. For example, the MPC module 312 may include a sequence determination module 316. The sequence determination module 316 determines possible sequences of the target values 266-270 that could be used together during N future control loops. Each of the possible sequences identified by the sequence determination module 316 includes one sequence of N values for each of the target values 266-270. In other words, each possible sequence includes a sequence of N values for the target wastegate opening area 266, a sequence of N values for the target throttle opening area 267, a sequence of N values for the target EGR opening area 268, a sequence of N values for the target intake cam phaser angle 269, and a sequence of N values for the target exhaust cam phaser angle 270. Each of the N values are for a corresponding one of the N future control loops. N is an integer greater than or equal to one.

A prediction module 323 determines predicted responses of the engine 102 to the possible sequences of the target values 266-270, respectively, based on a mathematical model 324 of the engine 102, exogenous inputs 328, and feedback inputs 330. More specifically, based on a possible sequence of the target values 266-270, the exogenous inputs 328, and the feedback inputs 330, using the model 324, the prediction module 323 generates a sequence of predicted torques of the engine 102 for the N control loops, a sequence of predicted APCs for the N control loops, a sequence of predicted amounts of external dilution for the N control loops, a sequence of predicted amounts of residual dilution for the N control loops, a sequence of predicted combustion phasing values for the N control loops, and a sequence of predicted combustion quality values for the N control loops. While an example of generating predicted torque, predicted APC, predicted external dilution, predicted residual dilution, predicted combustion phasing, and predicted combustion quality is described, the predicted parameters may include one or more other predicted engine operating parameters.

The model 324 may include, for example, a function or a mapping calibrated based on characteristics of the engine 102. Dilution may refer to an amount of exhaust from a prior combustion event trapped within a cylinder for a combustion event. External dilution may refer to exhaust provided for a combustion event via the EGR valve 170. Residual dilution may refer to exhaust that remains in a cylinder and/or exhaust that is pushed back into the cylinder following the exhaust stroke of a combustion cycle. Residual dilution may also be referred to as internal dilution.

Combustion phasing may refer to a crankshaft position where a predetermined amount of fuel injected is combusted within a cylinder relative to a predetermined crankshaft position for combustion of the predetermined amount of injected fuel. For example, combustion phasing may be expressed in terms of CA50 relative to a predetermined CA50. CA50 may refer to a crankshaft angle (CA) where 50 percent of a mass of injected fuel has been combusted within a cylinder. The predetermined CA50 may correspond to a CA50 where a maximum amount of work is produced from the fuel injected and may be approximately 8.5-approximately 10 degrees after TDC (top dead center) in various implementations. While combustion phasing will be discussed in terms of CA50 values, another suitable parameter indicative of combustion phasing may be used. Additionally, while combustion quality will be discussed as coefficient of variation (COV) of indicated mean effective pressure (IMEP) values, another suitable parameter indicative of combustion quality may be used.

The exogenous inputs 328 may include parameters that are not directly affected by the throttle valve 112, the EGR valve 170, the turbocharger, the intake cam phaser 148, and the exhaust cam phaser 150. For example, the exogenous inputs 328 may include engine speed, turbocharger inlet air pressure, IAT, and/or one or more other parameters. The feedback inputs 330 may include, for example, an estimated torque output of the engine 102, an exhaust pressure downstream of the turbine 160-1 of the turbocharger, the IAT, an APC of the engine 102, an estimated residual dilution, an estimated external dilution, and/or one or more other suitable parameters. The feedback inputs 330 may be measured using sensors (e.g., the IAT) and/or estimated based on one or more other parameters.

For example, the prediction module 323 may generate the predicted parameters for a given sequence of possible target values based on the relationships:

x(k+1)=Ax(k)+Bu(k); and

y(k)=Cx(k),

where k is a current control loop, x(k+1) is a vector with entries indicative of states of the engine 102 for a next control loop k+1, A is a matrix including constant values calibrated based on characteristics of the engine 102, x(k) is a vector with entries indicative of states of the engine 102 for the current control loop, B is a matrix including constant values calibrated based on characteristics of the engine 102, u(k) is a vector of including entries for the possible target values for the current control loop, y(k) is a vector including the predicted parameters for the current control loop, and C is a matrix including constant values calibrated based on characteristics of the engine 102. The vector x(k+1) determined during the current control loop will be used as the vector x(k) during the next control loop. The relationships could therefore also be written as:

x(k)=Ax(k−1)+Bu(k−1); and

y(k)=Cx(k),

where k is a current control loop, x(k−1) is a vector with entries indicative of states of the engine 102 for a last control loop, A is a matrix including constant values calibrated based on characteristics of the engine 102, x(k) is a vector with entries indicative of states of the engine 102 for the current control loop, B is a matrix including constant values calibrated based on characteristics of the engine 102, u(k−1) is a vector of including entries for the possible target values for the last control loop.

How the components of the above relationships can be re-written for the example of the predicted parameters including predicted torque predicted APC, predicted external dilution, predicted residual dilution, predicted combustion phasing, and predicted combustion quality will now be described. The vector x(k+1) can be re-written as:

${{x\left( {k + 1} \right)} = \begin{bmatrix} {x\; 1\left( {k + 1} \right)} \\ {x\; 2\left( {k + 1} \right)} \\ {x\; 3\left( {k + 1} \right)} \\ {x\; 4\left( {k + 1} \right)} \\ {x\; 5\left( {k + 1} \right)} \\ {x\; 6\left( {k + 1} \right)} \end{bmatrix}},$

where x1(k+1) is a first state parameter of the engine 102 for the next control loop, x2(k+1) is a second state parameter of the engine 102 for the next control loop, x3(k+1) is a third state parameter of the engine 102 for the next control loop, x4(k+1) is a fourth state parameter of the engine 102 for the next control loop, x5(k+1) is a fifth state parameter of the engine 102 for the next control loop, and x6(k+1) is a sixth state parameter of the engine 102 for the next control loop.

The matrix A can be re-written as:

$A = \begin{bmatrix} {a\; 11} & {a\; 12} & {a\; 13} & {a\; 14} & {a\; 15} & {a\; 16} \\ {a\; 21} & {a\; 22} & {a\; 23} & {a\; 24} & {a\; 25} & {a\; 26} \\ {a\; 31} & {a\; 32} & {a\; 33} & {a\; 34} & {a\; 35} & {a\; 36} \\ {a\; 41} & {a\; 42} & {a\; 43} & {a\; 44} & {a\; 45} & {a\; 46} \\ {a\; 51} & {a\; 52} & {a\; 53} & {a\; 54} & {a\; 55} & {a\; 56} \\ {a\; 61} & {a\; 62} & {a\; 63} & {a\; 64} & {a\; 65} & {a\; 66} \end{bmatrix}$

where a11-a66 are constant values calibrated based on characteristics of the engine 102.

The vector x(k) can be re-written as:

${{x(k)} = \begin{bmatrix} {x\; 1(k)} \\ {x\; 2(k)} \\ {x\; 3(k)} \\ {x\; 4(k)} \\ {x\; 5(k)} \\ {x\; 6(k)} \end{bmatrix}},$

where x1(k) is the first state parameter of the engine 102 for the current control loop, x2(k) is the second state parameter of the engine 102 for the current control loop, x3(k) is the third state parameter of the engine 102 for current control loop, x4(k) is the fourth state parameter of the engine 102 for the current control loop, x5(k) is the fifth state parameter of the engine 102 for the current control loop, and x6(k) is the sixth state parameter of the engine 102 for the current control loop. The entries of the vector x(k) are the entries of the vector x(k+1) calculated during the previous control loop. The entries of the vector x(k+1) calculated during the current control loop are used during the next control loop as the entries of vector x(k).

The matrix B can be re-written as:

$B = \begin{bmatrix} {b\; 11} & {b\; 12} & {b\; 13} & {b\; 14} & {b\; 15} & {b\; 16} \\ {b\; 21} & {b\; 22} & {b\; 23} & {b\; 24} & {b\; 25} & {b\; 26} \\ {b\; 31} & {b\; 32} & {b\; 33} & {b\; 34} & {b\; 35} & {b\; 36} \\ {b\; 41} & {b\; 42} & {b\; 43} & {b\; 44} & {b\; 45} & {b\; 46} \\ {b\; 51} & {b\; 52} & {b\; 53} & {b\; 54} & {b\; 55} & {b\; 56} \\ {b\; 61} & {b\; 62} & {b\; 63} & {b\; 64} & {b\; 65} & {b\; 66} \end{bmatrix}$

where b11-b65 are constant values calibrated based on characteristics of the engine 102.

The vector u(k) can be re-written as:

${{u(k)} = \begin{bmatrix} {PTT} \\ {PTWG} \\ {PTEGR} \\ {PTICP} \\ {PTECP} \end{bmatrix}},$

where PTT is a possible target throttle opening of a possible sequence for the current control loop, PTWG is a possible target wastegate opening of the possible sequence for the current control loop, PTEGR is a possible target EGR opening of the possible sequence for the current control loop, PTICP is a possible target intake cam phasing value of the possible sequence for the current control loop, and PTECP is a possible target exhaust cam phasing value of the possible sequence for the current control loop.

The vector y(k) can be re-written as:

${{y(k)} = \begin{bmatrix} {PT} \\ {PAPC} \\ {PED} \\ {PRD} \\ {PCP} \\ {PCQ} \end{bmatrix}},$

where PT is a predicted torque of the engine 102 for the current control loop, PAPC is a predicted APC of the engine 102 for the current control loop, PED is a predicted amount of external dilution for the current control loop, PRD is a predicted amount of residual dilution for the current control loop, PCP is a predicted combustion phasing for the current control loop, and PCQ is a predicted combustion quality for the current control loop.

The matrix C can be re-written as:

$C = \begin{bmatrix} {c\; 11} & {c\; 12} & {c\; 13} & {c\; 14} & {c\; 15} & {c\; 16} \\ {c\; 21} & {c\; 22} & {c\; 23} & {c\; 24} & {c\; 25} & {c\; 26} \\ {c\; 31} & {c\; 32} & {c\; 33} & {c\; 34} & {c\; 35} & {c\; 36} \\ {c\; 41} & {c\; 42} & {c\; 43} & {c\; 44} & {c\; 45} & {c\; 46} \\ {c\; 51} & {c\; 52} & {c\; 53} & {c\; 54} & {c\; 55} & {c\; 56} \\ {c\; 61} & {c\; 62} & {c\; 63} & {c\; 64} & {c\; 65} & {c\; 66} \end{bmatrix}$

where c11-c66 are constant values calibrated based on characteristics of the engine 102.

The model 324 includes several different sets of the A, B, and C matrices for different operating conditions. The prediction module 323 selects which set of the A, B, and C matrices to use based on the engine speed, engine load, and/or one or more other parameters.

For the example of the predicted parameters including predicted torque predicted APC, predicted external dilution, predicted residual dilution, predicted combustion phasing, and predicted combustion quality, the above relationships can therefore be re-written as:

$\begin{bmatrix} {x\; 1\left( {k + 1} \right)} \\ {x\; 2\left( {k + 1} \right)} \\ {x\; 3\left( {k + 1} \right)} \\ {x\; 4\left( {k + 1} \right)} \\ {x\; 5\left( {k + 1} \right)} \\ {x\; 6\left( {k + 1} \right)} \end{bmatrix} = {\begin{bmatrix} {a\; 11} & {a\; 12} & {a\; 13} & {a\; 14} & {a\; 15} & {a\; 16} \\ {a\; 21} & {a\; 22} & {a\; 23} & {a\; 24} & {a\; 25} & {a\; 26} \\ {a\; 31} & {a\; 32} & {a\; 33} & {a\; 34} & {a\; 35} & {a\; 36} \\ {a\; 41} & {a\; 42} & {a\; 43} & {a\; 44} & {a\; 45} & {a\; 46} \\ {a\; 51} & {a\; 52} & {a\; 53} & {a\; 54} & {a\; 55} & {a\; 56} \\ {a\; 61} & {a\; 62} & {a\; 63} & {a\; 64} & {a\; 65} & {a\; 66} \end{bmatrix}{\quad{{\begin{bmatrix} {x\; 1(k)} \\ {x\; 2(k)} \\ {x\; 3(k)} \\ {x\; 4(k)} \\ {x\; 5(k)} \\ {x\; 6(k)} \end{bmatrix} + {\begin{bmatrix} {b\; 11} & {b\; 12} & {b\; 13} & {b\; 14} & {b\; 15} & {b\; 16} \\ {b\; 21} & {b\; 22} & {b\; 23} & {b\; 24} & {b\; 25} & {b\; 26} \\ {b\; 31} & {b\; 32} & {b\; 33} & {b\; 34} & {b\; 35} & {b\; 36} \\ {b\; 41} & {b\; 42} & {b\; 43} & {b\; 44} & {b\; 45} & {b\; 46} \\ {b\; 51} & {b\; 52} & {b\; 53} & {b\; 54} & {b\; 55} & {b\; 56} \\ {b\; 61} & {b\; 62} & {b\; 63} & {b\; 64} & {b\; 65} & {b\; 66} \end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix} {PTT} \\ {PTWG} \\ {PTEGR} \\ {PTICP} \\ {PTECP} \end{bmatrix}}};\mspace{20mu} {{{and}\mspace{20mu}\begin{bmatrix} {PT} \\ {PAPC} \\ {PED} \\ {PRD} \\ {PCP} \\ {PCQ} \end{bmatrix}} = {{\begin{bmatrix} {c\; 11} & {c\; 12} & {c\; 13} & {c\; 14} & {c\; 15} & {c\; 16} \\ {c\; 21} & {c\; 22} & {c\; 23} & {c\; 24} & {c\; 25} & {c\; 26} \\ {c\; 31} & {c\; 32} & {c\; 33} & {c\; 34} & {c\; 35} & {c\; 36} \\ {c\; 41} & {c\; 42} & {c\; 43} & {c\; 44} & {c\; 45} & {c\; 46} \\ {c\; 51} & {c\; 52} & {c\; 53} & {c\; 54} & {c\; 55} & {c\; 56} \\ {c\; 61} & {c\; 62} & {c\; 63} & {c\; 64} & {c\; 65} & {c\; 66} \end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix} {x\; 1(k)} \\ {x\; 2(k)} \\ {x\; 3(k)} \\ {x\; 4(k)} \\ {x\; 5(k)} \\ {x\; 6(k)} \end{bmatrix}}.}}}}}$

The prediction module 323 may also adjust one or more of the predicted parameters based on differences between the predicted parameters and measured or estimated values of those parameters, respectively. For example, the prediction module 323 may include one or more integrators, such as one integrator for each of the predicted parameters. An integrator may determine an integrator value based on differences between a predicted parameter and a measured or estimated value of that parameter over a period of time.

For example, an integrator may determine a torque integrator value based on differences between the predicted torque and measured or estimated values of engine torque. Another integrator may determine an APC integrator value based on differences between the predicted APC and measured or estimated values of APC. The prediction module 323 may adjust the predicted parameters based on the associated integrator values before the predicted parameters are used in the cost determination. For example, the prediction module 323 may adjust the predicted torque based on the torque integrator value, adjust the predicted APC based on the APC integrator value, etc.

A cost module 332 determines a cost value for each of the possible sequences of the target values 266-270 based on the predicted parameters determined for a possible sequence and output reference values 356. An example cost determination is discussed further below.

A selection module 344 selects one of the possible sequences of the target values 266-270 based on the costs of the possible sequences, respectively. For example, the selection module 344 may select the one of the possible sequences having the lowest cost while satisfying actuator constraints 348 and output constraints 352. In various implementations, the model 324 may select the one of the possible sequences having the lowest cost while satisfying the actuator constraints 348 and the output constraints 352.

In various implementations, satisfaction of the actuator constraints 348 and the output constraints may be considered in the cost determination. In other words, the cost module 332 may determine the cost values further based on the actuator constraints 348 and the output constraints 352. As discussed further below, based on how the cost values are determined, the selection module 344 will select the one of the possible sequences that best achieves the base air torque request 308 while minimizing the APC, subject to the actuator constraints 348 and the output constraints 352.

The selection module 344 may set the target values 266-270 to the first ones of the N values of the selected possible sequence, respectively. In other words, the selection module 344 may set the target wastegate opening area 266 to the first one of the N values in the sequence of N values for the target wastegate opening area 266, set the target throttle opening area 267 to the first one of the N values in the sequence of N values for the target throttle opening area 267, set the target EGR opening area 268 to the first one of the N values in the sequence of N values for the target EGR opening area 268, set the target intake cam phaser angle 269 to the first one of the N values in the sequence of N values for the target intake cam phaser angle 269, and set the target exhaust cam phaser angle 270 to the first one of the N values in the sequence of N values for the target exhaust cam phaser angle 270.

During a next control loop, the MPC module 312 identifies possible sequences, generates the predicted parameters for the possible sequences, determines the cost of each of the possible sequences, selects of one of the possible sequences, and sets of the target values 266-270 to the first set of the target values 266-270 in the selected possible sequence. This process continues for each control loop.

An actuator constraint module 360 (see FIG. 2) sets the actuator constraints 348 for each of the target values 266-270. In other words, the actuator constraint module 360 sets actuator constraints for the throttle valve 112, actuator constraints for the EGR valve 170, actuator constraints for the wastegate 162, actuator constraints for the intake cam phaser 148, and actuator constraints for the exhaust cam phaser 150.

The actuator constraints 348 for each one of the target values 266-270 may include a maximum value for an associated target value and a minimum value for that target value. The actuator constraint module 360 may generally set the actuator constraints 348 to predetermined operational ranges for the associated actuators. More specifically, the actuator constraint module 360 may generally set the actuator constraints 348 to predetermined operational ranges for the throttle valve 112, the EGR valve 170, the wastegate 162, the intake cam phaser 148, and the exhaust cam phaser 150, respectively.

However, the actuator constraint module 360 may selectively adjust one or more of the actuator constraints 348 under some circumstances. For example, the actuator constraint module 360 may adjust the actuator constraints for a given actuator to narrow the operational range for that engine actuator when a fault is diagnosed in that engine actuator. For another example only, the actuator constraint module 360 may adjust the actuator constraints such that the target value for a given actuator follows a predetermined schedule over time or changes by a predetermined amount, for example, for a fault diagnostic, such as a cam phaser fault diagnostic, a throttle diagnostic, an EGR diagnostic, etc. For a target value to follow a predetermined schedule over time or to change by a predetermined amount, the actuator constraint module 360 may set the minimum and maximum values to the same value. The minimum and maximum values being set to the same value may force the corresponding target value to be set to the same value as the minimum and maximum values. The actuator constraint module 360 may vary the same value to which the minimum and maximum values are set over time to cause the target value to follow a predetermined schedule.

An output constraint module 364 (see FIG. 2) sets the output constraints 352 for the predicted torque output of the engine 102, the predicted CA50, the predicted COV of IMEP, the predicted residual dilution, and the predicted external dilution. The output constraints 352 for each one of the predicted values may include a maximum value for an associated predicted parameter and a minimum value for that predicted parameter. For example, the output constraints 352 may include a minimum torque, a maximum torque, a minimum CA50 and a maximum CA50, a minimum COV of IMEP and a maximum COV of IMEP, a minimum residual dilution and a maximum residual dilution, and a minimum external dilution and a maximum external dilution.

The output constraint module 364 may generally set the output constraints 352 to predetermined ranges for the associated predicted parameters, respectively. However, the output constraint module 364 may vary one or more of the output constraints 352 under some circumstances. For example, the output constraint module 364 may retard the maximum CA50, such as when knock occurs within the engine 102. For another example, the output constraint module 364 may increase the maximum COV of IMEP under low load conditions, such as during engine idling where the a higher COV of IMEP may be needed to achieve a given torque request.

A reference module 368 (see FIG. 2) generates the reference values 356 for the target values 266-270, respectively. The reference values 356 include a reference for each of the target values 266-270. In other words, the reference values 356 include a reference wastegate opening area, a reference throttle opening area, a reference EGR opening area, a reference intake cam phaser angle, and a reference exhaust cam phaser angle.

The reference module 368 may determine the reference values 356, for example, based on the air torque request 265 and/or the base air torque request 308. The reference values 356 provide references for setting the target values 266-270, respectively. The reference values 356 may be used to determine the cost values for possible sequences, as discussed further below. The reference values 356 may also be used for one or more other reasons, such as by the sequence determination module 316 to determine possible sequences.

Instead of or in addition to generating sequences of possible target values and determining the cost of each of the sequences, the MPC module 312 may identify a sequence of possible target values having the lowest cost using convex optimization techniques. For example, the MPC module 312 may determine the target values 266-270 using a quadratic programming (QP) solver, such as a Dantzig QP solver. In another example, the MPC module 312 may generate a surface of cost values for the possible sequences of the target values 266-270 and, based on the slope of the cost surface, identify a sequence of possible target values having the lowest cost. The MPC module 312 may then test that sequence of possible target values to determine whether that sequence of possible target values satisfies the actuator constraints 348 and the output constraints 352. If so, the MPC module 312 may set the target values 266-270 to the first ones of the N values of that selected possible sequence, respectively, as discussed above.

If the actuator constraints 348 and/or the output constraints 352 are not satisfied, the MPC module 312 selects another sequence of possible target values with a next lowest cost and tests that sequence of possible target values for satisfaction of the actuator constraints 348 and the output constraints 352. The process of selecting a sequence and testing the sequence for satisfaction of the actuator constraints 348 and the output constraints 352 may be referred to as an iteration. Multiple iterations may be performed during each control loop.

The MPC module 312 performs iterations until a sequence with the lowest cost that satisfies the actuator constraints 348 and the output constraints 352 is identified. In this manner, the MPC module 312 selects the sequence of possible target values having the lowest cost while satisfying the actuator constraints 348 and the output constraints 352. If a sequence cannot be identified, the MPC module 312 may indicate that no solution is available.

The cost module 332 may determine the cost for the possible sequences of the target values 266-270 based on relationships between: the predicted torque and the base air torque request 308; the predicted APC and a predetermined minimum APC; the possible target values and the respective actuator constraints 348; the other predicted parameters and the respective output constraints 352; and the possible target values and the respective reference values 356. The relationships may be weighted, for example, to control the effect that each of the relationships has on the cost.

For example only, the cost module 332 may determine the cost for a possible sequence of the target values 266-270 based on the following relationship:

Cost=Σ_(i=1) ^(N)ρε²+∥wT*(TP_(i)−BATR)∥²+∥wA*(APCP_(i)−MinAPC)∥²+∥wTV*(PTTOi−TORef)∥²+∥wWG*(PTWGOi−EGORef)∥²+∥wEGR*(PTEGROi−EGRORef)∥²+∥wIP*(PTICPi−ICPRef)∥²+∥wEP*(PTECPi−ECPRef)∥²,

subject to the actuator constraints 348 and the output constraints 352. Cost is the cost for the possible sequence of the target values 266-270, TPi is the predicted torque of the engine 102 for an i-th one of the N control loops, BATR is the base air torque request 308, and wT is a weighting value associated with the relationship between the predicted torque and the base air torque request 308. APCPi is a predicted APC for the i-th one of the N control loops, MinAPC is the predetermined minimum APC, and wA is a weighting value associated with the relationship between the predicted APC and the predetermined minimum APC.

PTTOi is a possible target throttle opening for the i-th one of the N control loops, TORef is the reference throttle opening, and wTV is a weighting value associated with the relationship between the possible target throttle openings and the reference throttle opening. PTWGOi is a possible target wastegate opening for the i-th one of the N control loops, WGORef is the reference wastegate opening, and wWG is a weighting value associated with the relationship between the possible target wastegate openings and the reference wastegate opening.

PTEGROi is a possible target EGR opening for the i-th one of the N control loops, EGRRef is the reference EGR opening, and wEGR is a weighting value associated with the relationship between the possible target EGR openings and the reference EGR opening. PTICi is a possible target intake cam phaser angle for the i-th one of the N control loops, ICPRef is the reference intake cam phaser angle, and wIP is a weighting value associated with the relationship between the possible target intake cam phaser angle and the reference intake cam phaser angle. PTECi is a possible target exhaust cam phaser angle for the i-th one of the N control loops, ECPRef is the reference exhaust cam phaser angle, and wEP is a weighting value associated with the relationship between the possible target exhaust cam phaser angle and the reference exhaust cam phaser angle.

ρ is a weighting value associated with satisfaction of the output constraints 352. ε is a variable that the cost module 332 may set based on whether the output constraints 352 will be satisfied. For example, the cost module 332 may increase E when a predicted parameter is greater than or less than the corresponding minimum or maximum value (e.g., by at least a predetermined amount). The cost module 332 may set E to zero when all of the output constraints 352 are satisfied. ρ may be greater than the weighting value wT, the weighting value wA, and the other weighting values (wTV, wWG, wEGR, wIP, wEP) such that the cost determined for a possible sequence will be large if one or more of the output constraints 352 are not satisfied. This may help prevent selection of a possible sequence where one or more of the output constraints 352 are not satisfied.

The weighting value wT may be greater than the weighting value wA and the weighting values wTV, wWG, wEGR, wIP, and wEP. In this manner, the relationship between the relationship between the predicted engine torque and the base air torque request 308 have a larger effect on the cost and, therefore, the selection of one of the possible sequences as discussed further below. The cost increases as the difference between the predicted engine torque and the base air torque request 308 increases and vice versa.

The weighting value wA may be less than the weighting value wT and greater than the weighting values wTV, wWG, wEGR, wIP, and wEP. In this manner, the relationship between the predicted APC and zero has a large effect on the cost, but less than the relationship between the predicted engine torque and the base air torque request 308. The cost increases as the difference between the predicted APC and the predetermined minimum APC increases and vice versa. For example only, the predetermined minimum APC may be zero or another suitable value.

Determining the cost based on the difference between the predicted APC and the predetermined minimum APC helps ensure that the APC will be minimized. Decreasing APC decreases fuel consumption as fueling is controlled based on the actual APC to achieve a target air/fuel mixture. As the selection module 344 may select the one of the possible sequences having the lowest cost, the selection module 344 may select the one of the possible sequences that best achieves the base air torque request 308 while minimizing the APC. While the example of minimizing APC is discussed, in various implementations, an efficiency parameter may be predicted and maximized. For example, the efficiency parameter may be predicted torque divided by predicted APC.

The weighting values wTV, wWG, wEGR, wIP, and wEP may be less than all of the other weighting values. In this manner, during steady-state operation, the target values 266-270 may settle near or at the reference values 356, respectively. During transient operation, however, the MPC module 312 may adjust the target values 266-270 away from the reference values 356 in order to achieve the base air torque request 308, while minimizing the APC and satisfying the actuator constraints 348 and the output constraints 352.

Referring now to FIG. 4, a flowchart depicting an example method of controlling the throttle valve 112, the intake cam phaser 148, the exhaust cam phaser 150, the wastegate 162 (and therefore the turbocharger), and the EGR valve 170 using MPC (model predictive control) is presented. Control may begin with 404 where the torque requesting module 224 determines the air torque request 265 based on the adjusted predicted and immediate torque requests 263 and 264.

At 408, the torque conversion module 304 may convert the air torque request 265 into the base air torque request 308 or into another suitable type of torque for use by the MPC module 312. The sequence determination module 316 determines possible sequences of the target values 266-270 based on the base air torque request 308 at 412.

At 416, the prediction module 323 determines the predicted parameters for each of the possible sequences of target values. The prediction module 323 determines the predicted parameters for the possible sequences based on the model 324 of the engine 102, the exogenous inputs 328, and the feedback inputs 330. More specifically, based on a possible sequence of the target values 266-270, the exogenous inputs 328, and the feedback inputs 330, using the model 324, the prediction module 323 generates a sequence of predicted torques of the engine 102 for the N control loops, a sequence of predicted APCs for the N control loops, a sequence of predicted amounts of external dilution for the N control loops, a sequence of predicted amounts of residual dilution for the N control loops, a sequence of predicted combustion phasing values for the N control loops, and a sequence of predicted combustion quality values for the N control loops.

The cost module 332 determines the costs for the possible sequences, respectively, at 420. For example only, the cost module 332 may determine the cost for a possible sequence of the target values 266-270 based on the equation

Cost=Σ_(i=1) ^(N)ρε²+∥wT*(TP_(i)−BATR)∥²+∥wA*(APCP_(i)−MinAPC)∥²+∥wTV*(PTTOi−TORef)∥²+∥wWG*(PTWGOi−EGORef)∥²+∥wEGR*(PTEGROi−EGRORef)∥²+∥wIP*(PTICPi−ICPRef)∥²+∥wEP*(PTECPi−ECPRef)∥²,

subject to the actuator constraints 348 and the output constraints 352, as discussed above.

The selection module 344 selects one of the possible sequences of the target values 266-270 based on the costs of the possible sequences, respectively, at 424. For example, the selection module 344 may select the one of the possible sequences having the lowest cost. The selection module 344 may therefore select the one of the possible sequences that best achieves the base air torque request 308 while minimizing the APC. Instead of or in addition to determining possible sequences of the target values 230-244 at 412 and determining the cost of each of the sequences at 420, the MPC module 312 may identify a sequence of possible target values having the lowest cost using convex optimization techniques as discussed above.

The MPC module 312 may determine whether the selected one of the possible sequences satisfies the actuator constraints 348 at 425. If 425 is true, control may continue with 428. If 425 is false, the MPC module 312 may determine, based on the selected possible sequence, a possible sequence that satisfies the actuator constraints 348 and that has the lowest cost at 426, and control may continue with 428. The possible sequence that satisfies the actuator constraints 348 and that has the lowest cost may be used, as discussed below.

At 428, the first conversion module 272 converts the target wastegate opening area 266 into the target duty cycle 274 to be applied to the wastegate 162, the second conversion module 276 converts the target throttle opening area 267 into the target duty cycle 278 to be applied to the throttle valve 112. The third conversion module 280 also converts the target EGR opening area 268 into the target duty cycle 282 to be applied to the EGR valve 170 at 428. The fourth conversion module may also convert the target intake and exhaust cam phaser angles 269 and 270 into the target intake and exhaust duty cycles to be applied to the intake and exhaust cam phasers 148 and 150, respectively.

At 432, the throttle actuator module 116 controls the throttle valve 112 to achieve the target throttle opening area 267, and the phaser actuator module 158 controls the intake and exhaust cam phasers 148 and 150 to achieve the target intake and exhaust cam phaser angles 269 and 270, respectively. For example, the throttle actuator module 116 may apply a signal to the throttle valve 112 at the target duty cycle 278 to achieve the target throttle opening area 267.

Also at 432, the EGR actuator module 172 controls the EGR valve 170 to achieve the target EGR opening area 268, and the boost actuator module 164 controls the wastegate 162 to achieve the target wastegate opening area 266. For example, the EGR actuator module 172 may apply a signal to the EGR valve 170 at the target duty cycle 282 to achieve the target EGR opening area 268, and the boost actuator module 164 may apply a signal to the wastegate 162 at the target duty cycle 274 to achieve the target wastegate opening area 266. While FIG. 4 is shown as ending after 432, FIG. 4 may be illustrative of one control loop, and control loops may be executed at a predetermined rate.

Referring back to FIG. 3, a fault diagnostic module 380 may monitor the MPC module 312 and diagnose the presence of one or more faults in the MPC module 312. The fault diagnostic module 380 generates a fault signal 384 when one or more faults are present in the MPC module 312. A switching module 388 may set the target values 266-270 to those set by the MPC module 312 when the fault signal 384 is not generated.

When the fault signal 384 is generated, the switching module 388 sets the target values 266-270 to the reference values 356, respectively. More specifically, the switching module 388 may set the target wastegate opening area 266 to the reference wastegate opening area, the target throttle opening area 267 to the reference throttle opening area, the target EGR opening area 268 to the reference EGR opening area, the target intake cam phaser angle 269 to the reference intake cam phaser angle, and the target exhaust cam phaser angle 270 to the reference exhaust cam phaser angle. Changes in the target values 266-270 may be rate limited.

The fault diagnostic module 380 may monitor the integrator values and compare the integrator values with respective predetermined values. When an integrator value is greater than the respective predetermined value, the fault diagnostic module 380 may determine whether the integrator value would be less than the respective predetermined value if a different set of the A, B, and C matrices was used.

For example, the fault diagnostic module 380 may determine a next closest set of the A, B, and C matrices to the current operating conditions. The fault diagnostic module 380 may determine the integrator values based on that set of the A, B, and C matrices. The fault diagnostic module 380 may determine whether the integrator values determined based on that set of the A, B, and C matrices are less than the respective predetermined values. If so, the fault diagnostic module 380 may command the prediction module 323 to use that set of the A, B, and C matrices.

The fault diagnostic module 380 may diagnose a fault in the MPC module 312 when at least a predetermined number of the integrator values are greater than the predetermined values, respectively. The predetermined number is an integer greater than 1 and less than or equal to the number of predicted parameters.

The fault diagnostic module 380 may also diagnose a fault in the MPC module 312 when the MPC module 312 indicates that no solution is available to a given set of inputs. The fault diagnostic module 380 may also diagnose a fault in the MPC module 312 when one or more of the target values 266-270 set by the MPC module 312 is outside of one or more of the respective actuator constraints 348.

The fault diagnostic module 380 may also diagnose a fault in the MPC module 312 when the cost determined for a sequence selected and tested during one iteration is less than the cost determined for a sequence selected and tested during a previous iteration of a control loop. As discussed above, the MPC module 312 the cost of the selected sequences should increase (or at least stay the same) from iteration to iteration during a control loop. Thus, a decrease in the cost of selected sequences from iteration to iteration of a control loop may be indicative of a fault in the MPC module 312.

The fault diagnostic module 380 may also diagnose a fault in the MPC module 312 when, for two or more different control loops, more than a predetermined maximum number of iterations have been performed to select the sequence of target values for use. As discussed above, multiple iterations may be performed during a control loop to identify a possible sequence of the target values for use. The possible sequence may be identified too late for use during the current control loop, however, when more than the predetermined maximum number of iterations are performed in order to select that possible sequence. Performing more than the predetermined maximum number of iterations for two or more control loops during a predetermined number of control loops may indicate a fault in the MPC module 312.

As discussed above, the fault diagnostic module 380 generates the fault signal 384 when one or more faults are diagnosed in the MPC module 312. The fault diagnostic module 380 may take one or more other actions when one or more faults are diagnosed in the MPC module 312.

For example, the fault diagnostic module 380 may perform one or more tests on the MPC module 312 when one or more faults are diagnosed in the MPC module 312. The fault diagnostic module 380 may provide a first predetermined set of inputs to the prediction module 323 for a first test of the MPC module 312. The first predetermined set of inputs may include, for example, A, B, and C matrices to use, predetermined values for the vector x(k), and predetermined values for the vector u(k). The prediction module 323 generates the vector x(k+1) and the vector y(k) based on the first predetermined set of inputs.

The fault diagnostic module 380 may determine that the MPC module 312 passed the first test when the values of the vectors x(k+1) and y(k) generated based on the first predetermined set of inputs are the same as predetermined expected values, respectively. The fault diagnostic module 380 may determine that the MPC module 312 failed the first test when one or more of the values of the vectors x(k+1) and y(k) generated based on the first predetermined set of inputs are different than the predetermined expected values, respectively.

The fault diagnostic module 380 may set the values of the vector x(k) to predetermined initialization values for a second test of the MPC module 312. The fault diagnostic module 380 may then monitor the integrator values to determine whether the integrator values are less than the respective predetermined values.

The fault diagnostic module 380 may determine that the second test passed when the integrator values are less than the respective predetermined values after the values of the vector x(k) are set to the predetermined initialization values. The fault diagnostic module 380 may determine that the second test failed when one or more of the integrator values remain greater than the respective predetermined values for a predetermined period after the values of the vector x(k) are set to the predetermined initialization values.

The fault diagnostic module 380 may provide a second predetermined set of inputs to the MPC module 312 for a third test. The second predetermined set of inputs may include a predetermined base air torque request, predetermined reference values, predetermined exogenous and feedback inputs, predetermined output constraints, and predetermined actuator constraints. The second predetermined set of inputs may also include other predetermined values for other parameters that are used by the MPC module 312 to set the target values 266-270. The MPC module 312 is expected to set the target values 266-270 to predetermined values, respectively, based on the second predetermined set of inputs.

The fault diagnostic module 380 may determine that the MPC module 312 passed the third test when the target values 266-270 set based on the second predetermined set of inputs are the same as the respective predetermined values. The fault diagnostic module 380 may determine that the MPC module 312 failed the third test when one or more of the target values 266-270 are different than the respective predetermined values.

When all of the tests have passed, the fault diagnostic module 380 may stop generating the fault signal 384. The switching module 388 may then select the target values set by the MPC module 312 for use. When one or more of the tests have failed, the fault diagnostic module 380 may continue to generate the fault signal 384 to continue the use of the reference values 356. When one or more of the tests have failed for a predetermined period, the fault diagnostic module 380 may set a predetermined diagnostic trouble code (DTC) in memory, illuminate a malfunction indicator lamp (not shown), and/or take one or more other remedial actions.

Referring now to FIG. 5, a flowchart depicting an example method of diagnosing faults in the MPC module 312. Control may begin with 504 where the fault diagnostic module 380 determines whether an integrator value is greater than the respective predetermined value. As described above, the MPC module 312 includes an integrator determines the integrator value based on differences between predicted values of a parameter and estimated or measured values of that parameter. If 504 is true, control continues with 508. If 504 is false, control may continue with 528, which is discussed further below.

At 508, the fault diagnostic module 380 determines whether the integrator value would be less than the respective predetermined value if another set of the A, B, and C matrices was used to determine the predicted parameter used to determine the integrator value. If 508 is true, the fault diagnostic module 380 may command the MPC module 312 to use that set of the A, B, and C matrices at 512, and control continues with 516. If 508 is false, control may continue with 528.

At 516, the fault diagnostic module 380 determines whether two or more of the integrator values are greater than the respective predetermined values. If 516 is true, the fault diagnostic module 380 generates the fault signal 384 to indicate that a fault is present in the MPC module 312 at 524. In response to the generation of the fault signal 384, the switching module 388 selects the reference values 356 for use as the target values 266-270, respectively, at 524. In various implementations, 516 may be performed before 512, such as after 504 and before 508, or after 508 and before 512. In such an implementation, control may end after 512.

The fault diagnostic module 380 determines whether the cost determined for the selected sequence decreases from one iteration to a later iteration at 528. If 528 is true, the fault diagnostic module 380 generates the fault signal 384 to indicate that a fault is present in the MPC module 312, and the reference values 356 are used at 524. If 528 is false, control may continue with 532.

At 532, the fault diagnostic module 380 determines whether the MPC module 312 has indicated that no solution is available for setting the target values 266-270. If 532 is true, the fault diagnostic module 380 generates the fault signal 384 to indicate that a fault is present in the MPC module 312, and the reference values 356 are used at 524. If 532 is false, control may continue with 536.

The fault diagnostic module 380 determines whether one or more of the target values 266-270 set by the MPC module 312 are outside of one or more of the actuator constraints 348 at 536. If 536 is true, the fault diagnostic module 380 generates the fault signal 384 to indicate that a fault is present in the MPC module 312, and the reference values 356 are used at 524. If 536 is false, control may continue with 540.

At 540, the fault diagnostic module 380 may determine whether more than the predetermined maximum number of iterations were performed by the MPC module 312 to select one of the possible sequences for at least the predetermined number of control loops. If 540 is true, the fault diagnostic module 380 generates the fault signal 384 to indicate that a fault is present in the MPC module 312, and the reference values 356 are used at 524. If 540 is false, control may end. While FIG. 5 is shown as ending after 524 or 540, FIG. 5 may be illustrative of one control loop, and control loops may be executed at a predetermined rate. This predetermined rate may be the same or different than the predetermined rate of the control loops of FIG. 4.

Referring now to FIG. 6, a flowchart depicting an example method of testing the MPC module 312 is presented. Control may begin with 604 where the fault diagnostic module 380 determines whether one or more faults are present in the MPC module 312. If 604 is true, control continues with 608. If 604 is false, control may remain at 604. Discussion of diagnosing faults in the MPC module 312 is discussed above.

At 608, the fault diagnostic module 380 provides the first predetermined set of inputs to the prediction module 323 for the first test of the MPC module 312. The prediction module 323 generates the vector x(k+1) and the vector y(k) based on the first predetermined set of inputs.

At 612, the fault diagnostic module 380 determines whether the values of the vectors x(k+1) and y(k) generated by the MPC module 312 based on the first predetermined set of inputs are the same as the predetermined expected values, respectively. If 612 is true, the fault diagnostic module 380 may determine that the MPC module 312 has passed the first test, and control may continue with 616. If 612 is false, the fault diagnostic module 380 may determine that the MPC module 312 failed the first test, and control may continue with 636, which is discussed further below.

At 616, the fault diagnostic module 380 may command the prediction module 323 to set the values of the vector x(k) to the predetermined initialization values for the second test. At 620, the fault diagnostic module 380 monitors the integrator values and determines whether the integrator values become less than the respective predetermined values. If 620 is true, the fault diagnostic module 380 may determine that the MPC module 312 has passed the second test, and control may continue with 624. If 620 is false, the fault diagnostic module 380 may determine that the MPC module 312 failed the second test, and control may continue with 636.

The fault diagnostic module 380 provides the second predetermined set of inputs to the MPC module 312 at 624. Based on the second predetermined set of inputs, the MPC module 312 selects one of the possible sequences of target values and generates a set of target values based on the first one of each of the target values of the selected possible sequence.

At 628, the fault diagnostic module 380 determines whether the target values set by the MPC module 312 based on the second predetermined set of inputs are the same as predetermined expected values, respectively. If 628 is true, the fault diagnostic module 380 may determine that the MPC module 312 has passed the third test, and control may continue with 632. If 628 is false, the fault diagnostic module 380 may determine that the MPC module 312 failed the third test, and control may continue with 636.

At 632, when the fault diagnostic module 380 has determined that all of the tests have passed, the fault diagnostic module 380 may determine that no fault is present in the MPC module 312 and disable generation of the fault signal 384. The switching module 388 then uses the target values set by the MPC module 312.

At 636, when the fault diagnostic module 380 has determined that one or more of the tests have failed, the fault diagnostic module 380 may determine that one or more faults are present in the MPC module 312 and continue to generate the fault signal 384. As such, the switching module 388 continues to use the reference values 356 to control the respective actuators.

The foregoing description is merely illustrative in nature and is in no way intended to limit the disclosure, its application, or uses. The broad teachings of the disclosure can be implemented in a variety of forms. Therefore, while this disclosure includes particular examples, the true scope of the disclosure should not be so limited since other modifications will become apparent upon a study of the drawings, the specification, and the following claims. As used herein, the phrase at least one of A, B, and C should be construed to mean a logical (A or B or C), using a non-exclusive logical OR. It should be understood that one or more steps within a method may be executed in different order (or concurrently) without altering the principles of the present disclosure.

In this application, including the definitions below, the term module may be replaced with the term circuit. The term module may refer to, be part of, or include an Application Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC); a digital, analog, or mixed analog/digital discrete circuit; a digital, analog, or mixed analog/digital integrated circuit; a combinational logic circuit; a field programmable gate array (FPGA); a processor (shared, dedicated, or group) that executes code; memory (shared, dedicated, or group) that stores code executed by a processor; other suitable hardware components that provide the described functionality; or a combination of some or all of the above, such as in a system-on-chip.

The term code, as used above, may include software, firmware, and/or microcode, and may refer to programs, routines, functions, classes, and/or objects. The term shared processor encompasses a single processor that executes some or all code from multiple modules. The term group processor encompasses a processor that, in combination with additional processors, executes some or all code from one or more modules. The term shared memory encompasses a single memory that stores some or all code from multiple modules. The term group memory encompasses a memory that, in combination with additional memories, stores some or all code from one or more modules. The term memory may be a subset of the term computer-readable medium. The term computer-readable medium does not encompass transitory electrical and electromagnetic signals propagating through a medium, and may therefore be considered tangible and non-transitory. Non-limiting examples of a non-transitory tangible computer readable medium include nonvolatile memory, volatile memory, magnetic storage, and optical storage.

The apparatuses and methods described in this application may be partially or fully implemented by one or more computer programs executed by one or more processors. The computer programs include processor-executable instructions that are stored on at least one non-transitory tangible computer readable medium. The computer programs may also include and/or rely on stored data. 

What is claimed is:
 1. An engine control system for a vehicle, comprising: a model predictive control (MPC) module that: identifies sets of possible target values based on an engine torque request; determines predicted operating parameters for the sets of possible target values, respectively; determines cost values for the sets of possible target values, respectively; selects one of the sets of possible target values based on the cost values; and sets target values based on the possible target values of the selected one of the sets; an actuator module that controls an engine actuator based on one of the target values; and a fault diagnostic module that selectively diagnoses a fault in the MPC module.
 2. The engine control system of claim 1 wherein the MPC module selects one of the sets of possible target values further based on predetermined ranges for the target values, respectively.
 3. The engine control system of claim 2 wherein the fault diagnostic module diagnoses the fault when one of the target values is outside of its predetermined range.
 4. The engine control system of claim 2 wherein the MPC module: identifies a first one of the sets of possible target values based on a first cost value of the first one of the sets; determines whether the possible target values of the first one of the possible sets are within the predetermined ranges, respectively; when one of the possible target values of the selected one of the sets is outside of its predetermined range, identifies a second one of the sets of possible target values based on a second cost value of the second one of the sets; and, when the possible target values of the second one of the sets are within the predetermined ranges, respectively, selects the second one of the sets.
 5. The engine control system of claim 4 wherein the fault diagnostic module diagnoses the fault when the second cost value of the second one of the sets is less than the first cost value of the first one of the sets.
 6. The engine control system of claim 2 wherein the fault diagnostic module diagnoses the fault in the MPC module when the MPC module fails to select one of the sets of possible target values within a predetermined period.
 7. The engine control system of claim 1 wherein the MPC module further determines an integrator value based on a difference between a first one of the predicted operating parameters and one of a measured and an estimated value of that operating parameter.
 8. The engine control system of claim 7 wherein the fault diagnostic module diagnoses the fault in the MPC module when the integrator value is greater than a predetermined value.
 9. The engine control system of claim 1 further comprising: a reference module that determines reference values based on the engine torque request, wherein, when the fault is diagnosed in the MPC module, the actuator module controls the engine actuator based on one of the reference values.
 10. The engine control system of claim 1 further comprising: a boost actuator module that controls opening of a wastegate of a turbocharger based on a second one of the target values; an exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) actuator module that controls opening of an EGR valve based on a third one of the target values; and a phaser actuator module that controls intake and exhaust valve phasing based on fourth and fifth ones of the target values, respectively, wherein the actuator module controls the opening of a throttle valve based on the one of the target values.
 11. An engine control method for a vehicle, comprising: using a model predictive control (MPC) module: identifying sets of possible target values based on an engine torque request; determining predicted operating parameters for the sets of possible target values, respectively; determining cost values for the sets of possible target values, respectively; selecting one of the sets of possible target values based on the cost values; and setting target values based on the possible target values of the selected one of the sets; controlling an engine actuator based on one of the target values; and selectively diagnosing a fault in the MPC module.
 12. The engine control method of claim 11 further comprising selecting one of the sets of possible target values further based on predetermined ranges for the target values, respectively.
 13. The engine control method of claim 12 further comprising diagnosing the fault when one of the target values is outside of its predetermined range.
 14. The engine control method of claim 12 further comprising: using the MPC module: identifying a first one of the sets of possible target values based on a first cost value of the first one of the sets; determining whether the possible target values of the first one of the possible sets are within the predetermined ranges, respectively; when one of the possible target values of the selected one of the sets is outside of its predetermined range, identifying a second one of the sets of possible target values based on a second cost value of the second one of the sets; and, when the possible target values of the second one of the sets are within the predetermined ranges, respectively, selecting the second one of the sets.
 15. The engine control method of claim 14 further comprising diagnosing the fault when the second cost value of the second one of the sets is less than the first cost value of the first one of the sets.
 16. The engine control method of claim 12 further comprising diagnosing the fault in the MPC module when the MPC module fails to select one of the sets of possible target values within a predetermined period.
 17. The engine control method of claim 11 further comprising determining an integrator value based on a difference between a first one of the predicted operating parameters and one of a measured and an estimated value of that operating parameter.
 18. The engine control method of claim 17 further comprising diagnosing the fault in the MPC module when the integrator value is greater than a predetermined value.
 19. The engine control method of claim 11 further comprising: determining reference values based on the engine torque request; and, when the fault is diagnosed in the MPC module, controlling the engine actuator based on one of the reference values.
 20. The engine control method of claim 11 further comprising: controlling opening of a wastegate of a turbocharger based on a second one of the target values; controlling opening of an exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) valve based on a third one of the target values; and controlling intake and exhaust valve phasing based on fourth and fifth ones of the target values, respectively, wherein the engine actuator is a throttle valve. 